If Johnson & Johnson think its good PR to sue the Red Cross for using (seriously) a Red Cross on products for sale, they must be nuts. That is SUCH an unattractive stance to adopt! Shame on them.
Wouldn’t all this money going to litgation be better served to help people in need of their services and products? « All Things Jennifer
August 12, 2007 by familoo
One Response
Leave a Reply
Tags
-
Recent Comments
Secrecy « Pink… on Sign of the Times Secrecy « Pink… on Sign of The Times Margaret Wilde on Court of Protection Secrecy Ch… 
Recent Court of Appeal Decisions (Civil Division)- TM (Zimbabwe) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 916 (30 July 2010)
- Sheffield City Council v Wall (Personal Representatives of) & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 922 (30 July 2010)
- ZA (Nigeria) & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 926 (30 July 2010)
Archives
Shame on them indeed.
Thanks for the link!