<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Law Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pinktape.co.uk/2007/10/17/top-10-law-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/2007/10/17/top-10-law-blogs/</link>
	<description>a blog from the family bar</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:28:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: familoo</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/2007/10/17/top-10-law-blogs/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>familoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 07:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalfamily.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/top-10-law-blogs/#comment-380</guid>
		<description>consider yourself blogrolled</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>consider yourself blogrolled</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nearly legal</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/2007/10/17/top-10-law-blogs/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>Nearly legal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalfamily.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/top-10-law-blogs/#comment-376</guid>
		<description>Good Heavens, don&#039;t feel bad. I certainly wasn&#039;t looking for the mutual listing yuckiness, just mentioning that you&#039;d already been tagged ;-)

I think the interesting thing about a &#039;top 10 at this moment&#039; exercise like this is the ones that appear in people&#039;s lists beyond the usual suspects. I hadn&#039;t seen feminist law profs, for instance, which is now on my usual reading list. I tried to broaden things a bit in mine, on the basis that the Geeklawyers and Conflict of Laws and of this world were already on plenty of lists and obviously good and well known. I wish I&#039;d found space for Head of Legal, though. It was going through a quiet spell at the time...

As for blogrolls, hint hint?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Heavens, don&#8217;t feel bad. I certainly wasn&#8217;t looking for the mutual listing yuckiness, just mentioning that you&#8217;d already been tagged ;-)</p>
<p>I think the interesting thing about a &#8216;top 10 at this moment&#8217; exercise like this is the ones that appear in people&#8217;s lists beyond the usual suspects. I hadn&#8217;t seen feminist law profs, for instance, which is now on my usual reading list. I tried to broaden things a bit in mine, on the basis that the Geeklawyers and Conflict of Laws and of this world were already on plenty of lists and obviously good and well known. I wish I&#8217;d found space for Head of Legal, though. It was going through a quiet spell at the time&#8230;</p>
<p>As for blogrolls, hint hint?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: familoo</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/2007/10/17/top-10-law-blogs/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>familoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 18:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalfamily.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/top-10-law-blogs/#comment-291</guid>
		<description>Hi Nearly Legal - I feel bad now for not putting you in my top ten...I had actually seen that you put me in your top ten (Thanks) but I think I was in the middle of something else when I read it and then promptly forgot all about it...doh.
Yes I can see some inbound links, but I think only those which are on a blogroll...you&#039;re right, I&#039;m already completely obsessed with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nearly Legal &#8211; I feel bad now for not putting you in my top ten&#8230;I had actually seen that you put me in your top ten (Thanks) but I think I was in the middle of something else when I read it and then promptly forgot all about it&#8230;doh.<br />
Yes I can see some inbound links, but I think only those which are on a blogroll&#8230;you&#8217;re right, I&#8217;m already completely obsessed with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nearly legal</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/2007/10/17/top-10-law-blogs/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Nearly legal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalfamily.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/top-10-law-blogs/#comment-276</guid>
		<description>Happy though I am to blame Geeklawyer for most of the evils in the world, this meme wasn&#039;t his doing, but rather started by the US based Blawgreview.

I&#039;m smugly going to point out that you were in my version of the top ten before that of Bloody Relations (and Jacqui G was also in mine):

http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/10/simply-the-best/

I liked your blog very much after finding it via John Bolch and it is certainly one of the very good Family law blogs around now. Alas I plough a more lonely furrow in housing.

Does Wordpress.com give you a way of checking your inbound links? It&#039;s an interesting way to find out who is reading your blog, if dangerous for the even remotely obsessive character.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy though I am to blame Geeklawyer for most of the evils in the world, this meme wasn&#8217;t his doing, but rather started by the US based Blawgreview.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m smugly going to point out that you were in my version of the top ten before that of Bloody Relations (and Jacqui G was also in mine):</p>
<p><a href="http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/10/simply-the-best/" rel="nofollow">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/10/simply-the-best/</a></p>
<p>I liked your blog very much after finding it via John Bolch and it is certainly one of the very good Family law blogs around now. Alas I plough a more lonely furrow in housing.</p>
<p>Does WordPress.com give you a way of checking your inbound links? It&#8217;s an interesting way to find out who is reading your blog, if dangerous for the even remotely obsessive character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: familoo</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/2007/10/17/top-10-law-blogs/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>familoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalfamily.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/top-10-law-blogs/#comment-272</guid>
		<description>Family Lore IS on my list...
thanx for adding me to your blogroll...i guess i need to update mine when i have a mo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Family Lore IS on my list&#8230;<br />
thanx for adding me to your blogroll&#8230;i guess i need to update mine when i have a mo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/2007/10/17/top-10-law-blogs/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalfamily.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/top-10-law-blogs/#comment-270</guid>
		<description>&quot;And some are ‘legal’ only by virtue of the fact that their author is a lawyer&quot;

I&#039;m going to make a guess who you are talking about ;)

surprised you didn&#039;t add John Bolch&#039;s Familiy Lore blog. Added you  to my blogrole</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And some are ‘legal’ only by virtue of the fact that their author is a lawyer&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to make a guess who you are talking about ;)</p>
<p>surprised you didn&#8217;t add John Bolch&#8217;s Familiy Lore blog. Added you  to my blogrole</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
