Comments on: Magistrate’s Religious Discrimination Claim Rejected by EAT http://pinktape.co.uk/courts/magistrates-religious-discrimination-claim-rejected-by-eat/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=magistrates-religious-discrimination-claim-rejected-by-eat a blog from the family bar Thu, 17 May 2012 22:33:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: fundamentally wrong « Pink Tape http://pinktape.co.uk/courts/magistrates-religious-discrimination-claim-rejected-by-eat/#comment-152 fundamentally wrong « Pink Tape Thu, 22 May 2008 13:41:24 +0000 http://legalfamily.wordpress.com/2007/11/08/magistrates-religious-discrimination-claim-rejected-by-eat/#comment-152 [...] May 22, 2008 by familoo Last night’s tv involved (apart from the footy) a Louie Theroux style documentary about a fundamentalist christian group who, amongst other things were behind the unsuccessful McClintock tribunal case (magistrate refusing to place children in the care system with same sex couples - see previous post). [...] [...] May 22, 2008 by familoo Last night’s tv involved (apart from the footy) a Louie Theroux style documentary about a fundamentalist christian group who, amongst other things were behind the unsuccessful McClintock tribunal case (magistrate refusing to place children in the care system with same sex couples – see previous post). [...]

]]>