It may have been good from the perspective of my client that I managed to completely dismantle the evidence of an inexperienced expert witness in the space of 10 minutes of extraordinary cross examination (more due to the extraordinary answers than the brilliance of my questions it should be said) and it may have been good from the same perspective that this led to the metaphorical judicial shredding of the report complete with its adverse recommendations, but it did not feel good to leave a young, part-qualified student witness visibly upset after her first experience of report writing and of giving evidence. The bad karma has been following me around ever since like my shadow (getting on the wrong train, getting shouted at by the Judge, laddering tights, dropping lunch on the floor of the train, tripping up steps, computers conspiring against me – you know the kind of thing). Can I get an uplift on my graduated fee for that?
Tags
access to justice adoption ancillary relief barrister barristers blogging CAFCASS care care proceedings child abuse child protection children contact courts discrimination divorce domestic violence equality family family courts family court system family justice system family law family proceedings fathers feminism financial law legal aid legal life legal news marathon new law news openness other legal blogs parenting procedure professional conduct public funding representation residence social work solicitors stuff-
Recent Comments
Secrecy « Pink… on Sign of the Times Secrecy « Pink… on Sign of The Times Margaret Wilde on Court of Protection Secrecy Ch…
Recent Court of Appeal Decisions (Civil Division)- TM (Zimbabwe) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 916 (30 July 2010)
- Sheffield City Council v Wall (Personal Representatives of) & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 922 (30 July 2010)
- ZA (Nigeria) & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 926 (30 July 2010)
Archives