Comments on: Shrinking the Lawyers http://pinktape.co.uk/cases/shrinking-the-lawyers/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=shrinking-the-lawyers a blog from the family bar Thu, 17 May 2012 22:33:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Experts, the press and a sloppy approach to evidence based reporting : pinktape.co.uk http://pinktape.co.uk/cases/shrinking-the-lawyers/#comment-2533 Experts, the press and a sloppy approach to evidence based reporting : pinktape.co.uk Mon, 19 Mar 2012 22:15:23 +0000 http://legalfamily.wordpress.com/2008/01/19/shrinking-the-lawyers/#comment-2533 [...] that he is an expert who seems not to be used much around these parts since I arrived in 2008 (and an article I wrote that referred to him in 2008) – I have no interest in whether or not the allegations are true other than the obvious [...] [...] that he is an expert who seems not to be used much around these parts since I arrived in 2008 (and an article I wrote that referred to him in 2008) – I have no interest in whether or not the allegations are true other than the obvious [...]

]]> By: familoo http://pinktape.co.uk/cases/shrinking-the-lawyers/#comment-177 familoo Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:17:12 +0000 http://legalfamily.wordpress.com/2008/01/19/shrinking-the-lawyers/#comment-177 ps I have added you to my blogroll. ps I have added you to my blogroll.

]]> By: familoo http://pinktape.co.uk/cases/shrinking-the-lawyers/#comment-176 familoo Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:09:03 +0000 http://legalfamily.wordpress.com/2008/01/19/shrinking-the-lawyers/#comment-176 Yes, you are right, my use of the term attachment here is a little sloppy, but this is not so in the article I am referring to which clearly describes attachment better than I, as a lawyer, could do. Although, I think the article uses the term in a more specific way than you do in your definition i.e. as a piece of scientific terminology. Yes, you are right, my use of the term attachment here is a little sloppy, but this is not so in the article I am referring to which clearly describes attachment better than I, as a lawyer, could do. Although, I think the article uses the term in a more specific way than you do in your definition i.e. as a piece of scientific terminology.

]]> By: Fiona http://pinktape.co.uk/cases/shrinking-the-lawyers/#comment-175 Fiona Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:15:02 +0000 http://legalfamily.wordpress.com/2008/01/19/shrinking-the-lawyers/#comment-175 Very interesting. An attachment is a strong emotional bond with a specific person that is enduring across time and I'm sceptical about the wide use of "attachment" here. Nonetheless, I think it is a valid point that clients are not served well when professionals (or indeed family and friends) take on the dispute as their own. (I will add you to my blogroll, if you have no objection.) Very interesting. An attachment is a strong emotional bond with a specific person that is enduring across time and I’m sceptical about the wide use of “attachment” here. Nonetheless, I think it is a valid point that clients are not served well when professionals (or indeed family and friends) take on the dispute as their own.

(I will add you to my blogroll, if you have no objection.)

]]>