<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Barristers &#8211; Verdict In</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pinktape.co.uk/2008/11/15/the-barristers-verdict-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/cases/the-barristers-verdict-in/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-barristers-verdict-in</link>
	<description>a blog from the family bar</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 21:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Barristers - Episode 4 &#171; Pink Tape</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/cases/the-barristers-verdict-in/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>The Barristers - Episode 4 &#171; Pink Tape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalfamily.wordpress.com/?p=318#comment-328</guid>
		<description>[...] Short - see my comments on episode 1, episode 2 and episode 3: more of the same. The final episode can be summarised thus: more shots of [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Short &#8211; see my comments on episode 1, episode 2 and episode 3: more of the same. The final episode can be summarised thus: more shots of [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baby P and The Barristers BBC 2 prog&#8230;&#8230; &#171; Insitelaw magazine</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/cases/the-barristers-verdict-in/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Baby P and The Barristers BBC 2 prog&#8230;&#8230; &#171; Insitelaw magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalfamily.wordpress.com/?p=318#comment-327</guid>
		<description>[...] Legal: Enforcing Postponed Possession Orders  PinkTape: The Barristers - Verdict In  &#8220;Part 1 was a bit of a disappointment for me, but I’ll keep an open mind until the end of [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Legal: Enforcing Postponed Possession Orders  PinkTape: The Barristers &#8211; Verdict In  &#8220;Part 1 was a bit of a disappointment for me, but I’ll keep an open mind until the end of [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charonqc</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/cases/the-barristers-verdict-in/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>charonqc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 22:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalfamily.wordpress.com/?p=318#comment-326</guid>
		<description>Hi - I found the programme rather turgid.  It had the dead hand of official PR spin all over it - not terribly adventurous filming - too many shots of a man in a black gown doing criminal damage to an Elizabethan floor with a staff and getting away with it.

A bit heavy going - perhaps I am being too critical - but it made the Bar look like a rather dull place to be?

I do not, as you know, practise - but I do enjoy observing what the learned friends and legal academic are up to having spent 25 years in legal education!

I do hope the next episodes are a bit more lively - there are, ironically, a fair number of very amusing, lively and progressive people at the Bar - so why all the loving shots of stained glass, wigs and robes....

Good to hear a view from a practising barrister.  Can well understand your irritation with dinners.  I did my dinners long ago - not for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8211; I found the programme rather turgid.  It had the dead hand of official PR spin all over it &#8211; not terribly adventurous filming &#8211; too many shots of a man in a black gown doing criminal damage to an Elizabethan floor with a staff and getting away with it.</p>
<p>A bit heavy going &#8211; perhaps I am being too critical &#8211; but it made the Bar look like a rather dull place to be?</p>
<p>I do not, as you know, practise &#8211; but I do enjoy observing what the learned friends and legal academic are up to having spent 25 years in legal education!</p>
<p>I do hope the next episodes are a bit more lively &#8211; there are, ironically, a fair number of very amusing, lively and progressive people at the Bar &#8211; so why all the loving shots of stained glass, wigs and robes&#8230;.</p>
<p>Good to hear a view from a practising barrister.  Can well understand your irritation with dinners.  I did my dinners long ago &#8211; not for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

