A really interesting article in yesterday’s Times by barrister Martha Cover at Coram. It sets out why the introduction of procedures designed to protect at risk children may have had the opposite effect to that desired – by discouraging the issue of proceedings in favour of focus on the provision of low level support services. She explains very well the process of ‘threshold inflation’ which has put children at risk and the switch-on-switch-off mechanism which enables services to be withdrawn from families who bounce along the bottom, every time there is a minor improvement.
Baby P – Why The System Fails Children At Risk
December 5, 2008 by familoo
Posted in stuff | Tagged care proceedings, children, family law, social workers | No Comments Yet
Leave a Reply
Tags
access to justice adoption ancillary relief barrister barristers blogging care care proceedings child abuse child protection children consultation contact courts discrimination divorce domestic violence family family justice system family law family proceedings fathers feminism financial law legal legal aid legal life legal myths legal news life marathon miscarriage of justice new law news openness other legal blogs procedure professional conduct public funding representation residence social work solicitors stuff-
Recent Comments
familoo on Orphan Movie Upset Esther on Orphan Movie Upset 
Beware of Greeks cau… on The Fruits of Labour
Recent Court of Appeal Decisions (Civil Division)Archives