Comments on: Scary Stuff – BNP White Paper on Family Law

By: family law solicitors London

family law solicitors London — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:53:38 +0000

Thanks for hightlighting this. I had seen the document and its a real worry but it does shows them in their true colours and that their idea of “family” is a very old victorian style one.

By: Jack Lewis

Jack Lewis — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:33:35 +0000

To a committed Christian, the BNP White Paper on family reform makes a great deal of sense!

PHOBIA – an intense irrational fear.

I have never yet met anyone who suffers with HOMOPHOBIA! but I have met very many people who do not like homosexuality, but never with an intense irrational fear! I don’t like spiders but I’m not arachnaphobic.

By: Dave

Dave — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:39:28 +0000

Sorry ti break up the anti-bnp party , but I liked the white paper . I have no idea why it has been removed from their site ,but anyonr that actually stands up for the rights of men (who are usually financially crippled by divorce ) is fine by me .
Why is it that anyone who stands up for men is derrided by the establishment ? All the BNP want is fairness and justice for all ,something that is lacking in society today

By: Rodney Noon

Rodney Noon — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:17:15 +0000

There is no copy of the white paper to be found on the BNP site although of course the cat is now well and truely out of the bag! Interestingly when I tried to find it under the party’s justice policies the only reference to family law was that “joint custody” would be the norm. Try reading the Children Act lads – nice try – 20 years too late.

I also note from other posts about the paper that the BNP do not accept that domestic violence happens. I think we had this debate in 1976.

Vote BNP for a forward looking approach to family law – I don’t think!

By: familoo

familoo — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:34:20 +0000

Wish I’d thought to save a copy. I was surprised it hadn’t been spotted and removed sooner actually.

By: Required Name

Required Name — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:04:18 +0000

The document seems to have been deleted at the location linked to, and I couldn’t find it anywhere else with a quick google search.

Any one save a copy that they could upload somewhere?

By: John W

John W — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:51:49 +0000

Thank you for bringing such a gross, repulsive and thoroughly vile document to light.

This should have been compulsary reading for everyone who voted and produced such a terrible result for this country.

By: Nick Langford

Nick Langford — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 07:41:31 +0000

Back in February 2004 some misguided (and not terribly bright) F4J members flirted with the BNP, possibly on the basis that the enemy of my enemy is my friend.

They were duly thrown out. One of them, Pete Molloy, who had been the Liverpool regional coordinator, is the author of this appalling document (I thought the style looked familiar and I did some digging).

I can confidently say that nothing in this intolerant, ignorant and illiterate document (how can they call it a white paper?) resembles anything ever published by F4J.

It is desperately sad that some disenfranchised fathers imagine that their problems will be solved through an alignment with racist, misogynist and homophobic politics. Now that F4J has bisbanded I suspect that we may see a resurgence of these primitive attitudes; if we do it will set back the cause of equal parenting by several decades.

By: Mark keenan

Mark keenan — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 10:21:12 +0000

Thank god that we don’t have PR in E&W for general elections.

Without it these morons have no chance of wielding any power whatsoever and will simply remain on the fringes as all their nasty predecessors have.

Nick Griffin and the majority of the senior BNP party have all been involved in crypto nazi politics in the past and a leopard very rarely changes it’s political spots.

By: Steve

Steve — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:45:13 +0000

I would find it very hard to believe that they consulted family lawyers. Rights are being stripped!