<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Protecting All Children – jus’ like that</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pinktape.co.uk/2009/08/13/protecting-all-children-jus-like-that/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/courts/protecting-all-children-jus-like-that/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=protecting-all-children-jus-like-that</link>
	<description>a blog from the family bar</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:04:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: An admirer of incisive comment</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/courts/protecting-all-children-jus-like-that/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>An admirer of incisive comment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinktape.co.uk/?p=742#comment-592</guid>
		<description>An excellent critique Lucy.
It is being circulated!
Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent critique Lucy.<br />
It is being circulated!<br />
Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natasha Phillips</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/courts/protecting-all-children-jus-like-that/#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>Natasha Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinktape.co.uk/?p=742#comment-591</guid>
		<description>I agree with you wholeheartedly and I think Kirby grossly over-simplifies the issues. Ironically, I think this is at the heart of why the system itself is failing.

We want to make it all better with a box.

To my mind at least, the problem lies in the levels of interest and the lack of earnest vocational minds. A great social worker is not great because she can tick lots of boxes and came top of her class at college. She is great because she has a &#039;feel&#039; for what she does, combined with a refined Principle Compass. That combination of talent and treading lightly is hard to find but a heavily bureaucratic system just deters that talent.

Technology and empiricial study make for useful guides, but they should never be our gods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you wholeheartedly and I think Kirby grossly over-simplifies the issues. Ironically, I think this is at the heart of why the system itself is failing.</p>
<p>We want to make it all better with a box.</p>
<p>To my mind at least, the problem lies in the levels of interest and the lack of earnest vocational minds. A great social worker is not great because she can tick lots of boxes and came top of her class at college. She is great because she has a &#8216;feel&#8217; for what she does, combined with a refined Principle Compass. That combination of talent and treading lightly is hard to find but a heavily bureaucratic system just deters that talent.</p>
<p>Technology and empiricial study make for useful guides, but they should never be our gods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

