http://pinktape.co.uk/2009/10/28/legal-costs/ a blog from the family bar Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:28:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://pinktape.co.uk/2009/10/28/legal-costs/#comment-2987 Simon Gibbs Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:49:00 +0000 http://pinktape.co.uk/?p=833#comment-2987 The piece certainly blurred the lines between legal costs and court fees. I also agree that the level of court fees is virtually irrelevant compared to that of legal costs. I made exactly the same criticism on the Legal Costs Blog: http://www.gwslaw.co.uk/blog/2009/04/apil-complains-about-excessive-costs-of.html . The piece certainly blurred the lines between legal costs and court fees. I also agree that the level of court fees is virtually irrelevant compared to that of legal costs. I made exactly the same criticism on the Legal Costs Blog: http://www.gwslaw.co.uk/blog/2009/04/apil-complains-about-excessive-costs-of.html .

]]> http://pinktape.co.uk/2009/10/28/legal-costs/#comment-2938 Hongi Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:03:43 +0000 http://pinktape.co.uk/?p=833#comment-2938 I did hear this report and it linked in with my work too. Court fee remissions are definitely not the same as reducing legal fees, which is what Jaggards do. They should not be confused but perhaps that is the ministerial line with the Jackson review ongoing. I did hear this report and it linked in with my work too. Court fee remissions are definitely not the same as reducing legal fees, which is what Jaggards do. They should not be confused but perhaps that is the ministerial line with the Jackson review ongoing.

]]>