<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CAFCASS Judicial Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pinktape.co.uk/2009/11/13/cafcass-judicial-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/2009/11/13/cafcass-judicial-review/</link>
	<description>a blog from the family bar</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:28:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Brand</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/2009/11/13/cafcass-judicial-review/#comment-3021</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Brand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 01:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinktape.co.uk/?p=842#comment-3021</guid>
		<description>What a load of twaddle. If Mr Hitchcock is who he says he is then he should know that the contents of a Cafacss officers report and its author are the subject of rigid and often lengthy cross examiniation from all the parties.

To make the contents of reports accountable under the complaints policy would in my humble opinion lead to an even greater increase in complaints being made, whic wold have a further knock on effect for scarce resources.
Surely his members must indicate that in private law matters at least the parent who considered themselves to be more disadvantaged would in most cases make a complaint.
The suggestion that a draft copy should be circulated an agreed by hge parties before filing with the Court is a nonsense. Cafcass often deals with dysfunctional families in crisis many of whom experience great difficulty in acknowledging the deficits in their parenting and the impact that this has had on the welfare of their child. In addition, many find it difficult if not imposible to work with social work departments etc. and even at times to mantain contact with their leagal advisers. 
To think that they could consider a draft copy of a report and agree it, I find farcical.
Anyhow isn&#039;t this what the Issue Resolution Hearing is for?

Finally he suggested improving the methodology, well he should be well pleased beacuse the workers are inundated with policy changes and changes to report templates all the tie. Often things are changed 2 or 3 times a month and leads to chaos and confusion.
Alice in Wonderland is what he is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a load of twaddle. If Mr Hitchcock is who he says he is then he should know that the contents of a Cafacss officers report and its author are the subject of rigid and often lengthy cross examiniation from all the parties.</p>
<p>To make the contents of reports accountable under the complaints policy would in my humble opinion lead to an even greater increase in complaints being made, whic wold have a further knock on effect for scarce resources.<br />
Surely his members must indicate that in private law matters at least the parent who considered themselves to be more disadvantaged would in most cases make a complaint.<br />
The suggestion that a draft copy should be circulated an agreed by hge parties before filing with the Court is a nonsense. Cafcass often deals with dysfunctional families in crisis many of whom experience great difficulty in acknowledging the deficits in their parenting and the impact that this has had on the welfare of their child. In addition, many find it difficult if not imposible to work with social work departments etc. and even at times to mantain contact with their leagal advisers.<br />
To think that they could consider a draft copy of a report and agree it, I find farcical.<br />
Anyhow isn&#8217;t this what the Issue Resolution Hearing is for?</p>
<p>Finally he suggested improving the methodology, well he should be well pleased beacuse the workers are inundated with policy changes and changes to report templates all the tie. Often things are changed 2 or 3 times a month and leads to chaos and confusion.<br />
Alice in Wonderland is what he is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Hitchcock</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/2009/11/13/cafcass-judicial-review/#comment-2986</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Hitchcock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinktape.co.uk/?p=842#comment-2986</guid>
		<description>I was a key stakeholder in the consultation process that led to the creation of CAFCAS. I argued that 1) CAFCASS should make its officers accountable for the content of their reports under its complaints policy, 2) its officers should produce draft reports to be agreed with the parties to family law proceedings before presentation to the court, and 3) CAFCASS should improve the methodology of its reports.

Brian Hitchcock
Coordinator
Family Law Society</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a key stakeholder in the consultation process that led to the creation of CAFCAS. I argued that 1) CAFCASS should make its officers accountable for the content of their reports under its complaints policy, 2) its officers should produce draft reports to be agreed with the parties to family law proceedings before presentation to the court, and 3) CAFCASS should improve the methodology of its reports.</p>
<p>Brian Hitchcock<br />
Coordinator<br />
Family Law Society</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: familoo</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/2009/11/13/cafcass-judicial-review/#comment-2984</link>
		<dc:creator>familoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinktape.co.uk/?p=842#comment-2984</guid>
		<description>See update on main post - this is not really what I understand this JR to be about (i.e. instances of poor standards on the part of individual social workers), nor is it the type of information they are presently seeking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See update on main post &#8211; this is not really what I understand this JR to be about (i.e. instances of poor standards on the part of individual social workers), nor is it the type of information they are presently seeking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/2009/11/13/cafcass-judicial-review/#comment-2983</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinktape.co.uk/?p=842#comment-2983</guid>
		<description>Who are the solicitors running this JR? Got some measurable, fantastic complaints that are about to be put to the GSCC concerning an ISW who also works for Cafcass if anyone is interested?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who are the solicitors running this JR? Got some measurable, fantastic complaints that are about to be put to the GSCC concerning an ISW who also works for Cafcass if anyone is interested?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: only a dad</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/2009/11/13/cafcass-judicial-review/#comment-2981</link>
		<dc:creator>only a dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinktape.co.uk/?p=842#comment-2981</guid>
		<description>http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed44167</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed44167" rel="nofollow">http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed44167</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guardians for kids &#171; WALL &#8211; a social worker&#39;s blog</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/2009/11/13/cafcass-judicial-review/#comment-2979</link>
		<dc:creator>Guardians for kids &#171; WALL &#8211; a social worker&#39;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinktape.co.uk/?p=842#comment-2979</guid>
		<description>[...] actually be identifiable individuals with names. Elsewhere some solicitors somewhere are intending judicially reviewing Cafcass over their failures to provide children with guardians (with or witout names) when they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] actually be identifiable individuals with names. Elsewhere some solicitors somewhere are intending judicially reviewing Cafcass over their failures to provide children with guardians (with or witout names) when they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Langford</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/2009/11/13/cafcass-judicial-review/#comment-2967</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Langford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinktape.co.uk/?p=842#comment-2967</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the source of this story, Lucy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the source of this story, Lucy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Grady</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/2009/11/13/cafcass-judicial-review/#comment-2966</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Grady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinktape.co.uk/?p=842#comment-2966</guid>
		<description>Do we know who this firm are?  I am a dad and a solicitor involved in children act proceedings.  My view is that the system is not equipped with what its trying to do leading to an amplification of the failings in the present law.  I would like to contribute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do we know who this firm are?  I am a dad and a solicitor involved in children act proceedings.  My view is that the system is not equipped with what its trying to do leading to an amplification of the failings in the present law.  I would like to contribute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CAFCASS being judicially reviewed?</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/2009/11/13/cafcass-judicial-review/#comment-2959</link>
		<dc:creator>CAFCASS being judicially reviewed?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinktape.co.uk/?p=842#comment-2959</guid>
		<description>[...] seen this confirmed from any Government source but the ultra reliable Pink Tape blog broke this story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seen this confirmed from any Government source but the ultra reliable Pink Tape blog broke this story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Greig</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/2009/11/13/cafcass-judicial-review/#comment-2958</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Greig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinktape.co.uk/?p=842#comment-2958</guid>
		<description>Just hoping this &quot;jolt&quot; may end up with improvements to an organisation that not too many people seem happy with.

From our perspective those of us who have had dealings recognise that the coal-face cafcass officers are not given sufficient time to do a proper job. 

And the results can be terrible beyond words.

(we would love to host your blog on our website by the way. What do you think)

Bob
Director
www.onlydads.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just hoping this &#8220;jolt&#8221; may end up with improvements to an organisation that not too many people seem happy with.</p>
<p>From our perspective those of us who have had dealings recognise that the coal-face cafcass officers are not given sufficient time to do a proper job. </p>
<p>And the results can be terrible beyond words.</p>
<p>(we would love to host your blog on our website by the way. What do you think)</p>
<p>Bob<br />
Director<br />
<a href="http://www.onlydads.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.onlydads.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
