<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Divorce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pinktape.co.uk/2009/12/27/facebook-divorce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/uncategorized/facebook-divorce/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=facebook-divorce</link>
	<description>a blog from the family bar</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:04:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Keenan</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/uncategorized/facebook-divorce/#comment-694</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Keenan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinktape.co.uk/?p=889#comment-694</guid>
		<description>Lucy

The papers always &quot;sex up&quot; press releases if they can get a decent story out of it.

They even get our domain name wrong as in the Sun article today which we had nothing to do with, but were quoted in.

Nevermind, the publicity is always welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucy</p>
<p>The papers always &#8220;sex up&#8221; press releases if they can get a decent story out of it.</p>
<p>They even get our domain name wrong as in the Sun article today which we had nothing to do with, but were quoted in.</p>
<p>Nevermind, the publicity is always welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: familoo</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/uncategorized/facebook-divorce/#comment-693</link>
		<dc:creator>familoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinktape.co.uk/?p=889#comment-693</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark, Thanks for your response. I hadn&#039;t imagined any different - and your experience of the ubiquity of Facebook matches mine entirely. Actually what I was getting at was the way it was reported in the article I cited, which is evidently a step beyond your original press release. And I see from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.familylore.co.uk/2010/01/what-are-you-doing.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Family Lore today&lt;/a&gt; that its not just facebook - now its twitter (Groans)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark, Thanks for your response. I hadn&#8217;t imagined any different &#8211; and your experience of the ubiquity of Facebook matches mine entirely. Actually what I was getting at was the way it was reported in the article I cited, which is evidently a step beyond your original press release. And I see from <a href="http://www.familylore.co.uk/2010/01/what-are-you-doing.html" rel="nofollow">Family Lore today</a> that its not just facebook &#8211; now its twitter (Groans)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark keenan</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/uncategorized/facebook-divorce/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark keenan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinktape.co.uk/?p=889#comment-692</guid>
		<description>As you know I am the person behind the story. The actual press release quite correctly referred to the fact that the word &quot;Facebook&quot; appeared in 989 out of 5,000 petitions, nothing more, nothing less.

The story came from some blog articles I had been reading from lawyers in the US about them sing facebook entries as evidence in adultery cases. I then thought I would see how many of our petitions ( as we have the largest UK database) featured the word.


I thought it would be an interesting story as it shows how ubiqutous faceBook has become in all our lives.

 In all of the interviews I have done subsequently I have made it plain that FaceBook does not cause divorce, people cause divorce, and it is merely the latest in a long line of tools that errant spouses use.

It is also easier to get caught because of facebook as you never know which one of your spouses 235 friends might be sat next to you in the restaurant while you are upto no good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you know I am the person behind the story. The actual press release quite correctly referred to the fact that the word &#8220;Facebook&#8221; appeared in 989 out of 5,000 petitions, nothing more, nothing less.</p>
<p>The story came from some blog articles I had been reading from lawyers in the US about them sing facebook entries as evidence in adultery cases. I then thought I would see how many of our petitions ( as we have the largest UK database) featured the word.</p>
<p>I thought it would be an interesting story as it shows how ubiqutous faceBook has become in all our lives.</p>
<p> In all of the interviews I have done subsequently I have made it plain that FaceBook does not cause divorce, people cause divorce, and it is merely the latest in a long line of tools that errant spouses use.</p>
<p>It is also easier to get caught because of facebook as you never know which one of your spouses 235 friends might be sat next to you in the restaurant while you are upto no good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Stewart</title>
		<link>http://pinktape.co.uk/uncategorized/facebook-divorce/#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>James Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 08:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinktape.co.uk/?p=889#comment-691</guid>
		<description>Great post.  The headlines &quot;One in five divorce cases use Facebook as evidence&quot;etc simply borrowed from some rather dubious &quot;research&quot; conducted by an on-line divorce outfit.In my view it was fabricated rubbish, a sad Xmas publicity stunt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  The headlines &#8220;One in five divorce cases use Facebook as evidence&#8221;etc simply borrowed from some rather dubious &#8220;research&#8221; conducted by an on-line divorce outfit.In my view it was fabricated rubbish, a sad Xmas publicity stunt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

