Pink Tape

A BLOG FROM THE FAMILY BAR

...in which I ricochet from too serious to too flippant and where I may vent, rant or wax lyrical at my own whim, mostly about family law. Constructive co-ranting welcome. More...

Newsletter

We have survived January! Rejoice!

It really was a loooong month, wasn’t it? Death, storms, and the general dank gloom that comes with this time of year. We escaped actual flooding or storm damage here, but it’s not far from us. Quite apart from the weather though, the flow of urgent tasks has been pretty relentless, there is always a remote meeting in the day’s forecast, and my days have been filled with the usual grim reading material. And my inbox…well the floodwater there has been pretty biblical.

I’ve done a month now as FLBA Vice Chair (one reason for the rising tide of emails). It’s been an eye opener. There is so much work to do, at this toughest of times for the family bar. Lots of my friends and colleagues are desperate for the resumption of legal aid payments but extremely worried about recoupments of the contingency payments. The mood is as dank as the weather. There is talk of people leaving the bar altogether, people who have just had enough, who feel unheard and disrespected, Please keep an eye on your FLBA emails for information and news – and if you aren’t receiving your members emails let us know. It’s important you know what is happening on your behalf and what help we can offer.

On Friday, over a hundred of us (by my guess) attended a valedictory for Rebecca Stevens, a much loved solicitor who died much too young. A salutary reminder that life is short, but also that you should live your passion. She was a little ray of sunshine.

In between the rain and the gloom though, January and February do bring the occasional moment of watery sunshine. Those are the best days, where the cold air bites your face and the bright sky makes you blink. Later on Friday we trudged around the headland with the dog. It was slippery underfoot but cheering. Little green shoots poking out and up along the way are always a reminder that nothing is forever. Kids grow up, parents, pets and friends leave us, and life moves on to another phase. The world is spinning and the tectonic plates are shifting around us as we hyper focus on our cases. At moments we look up and realise we are in a different place and a different time. It’s disorientating. In 2026 I resolved not to have any new years resolutions, but I tell myself I will look up and around more, breathe more, plant my feet on the ground more firmly.

Fond as I am of metaphor and analogy, I can’t promise that the eternal winter is about to come to an end on the fees front, but I can forecast change and turbulence ahead in our work lives. This spring will bring a new President (and a bunch of other appointments to the senior courts), a new practice direction on bundles (oh frabjous day!), the beginning of a return to regular legal aid payments and a (long and bmppy) process of sorting out the issues around VAT, income tax and recoupment that flow from the disastrous hack. Although I don’t know what lies ahead on legal aid fees, I sense an incoming weather system.

What is the difference between a ‘QLR’ and a QLR?

It's Friday. I've been staring at a screen all day and my eyes have gone funny from scrolling through spreadsheets. I need a change of scene before resuming the trawl. Or failing that a change of topic. Aha. I'll tackle that QLR judgment. I tell you now, I am perplexed by this one. I've been mulling it over in the back of my brain all week and its got me awl of a muddle. In the back of my brain I have been thinking up amusing alternative meanings for 'QLR'....imaginative unabbreviations if you will. Quite Limited Role. Question Lots. Really? Questions Lack Relevance? Questioning Like Rumpole Questioning Lite. Representation? Quite Literally Ridiculous... QLR Law: Resources? Quash Litigants' Rights Quell Litigant Rebellion Quite Like Representation Quixotic, Lost, Rare... Questions Largely Rhetorical Quizzical Looks Required Quick, Let's Run.... QLR Lost? Right.... Enough nonsense. To the case! Which is: K v P (Criminal Solicitor as Court-Appointed QLR) [2025] EWFC 321. (You can tell...

read more
Joining the dots…

Joining the dots…

Last week the Public Accounts Committee published a damning report telling us that family justice was failing families, that delay was an endemic problem, and that the system was fragmented, rubbish with data, lacked transparency and accountability, and as a result was inefficient. No surprises there. None of it is new. People have been shouting it into the void for years. The report drew particular attention to a shortage of District Judges and social workers, and to the failure to get on with implementing Pathfinder nationally. Whilst there isn't much to quibble about in the conclusions reached, notably missing is any focus on the resource issues that are a key part of the context to those delays and failures. If you don't fund a thing properly it ain't gonna work properly. The Family Law Bar Association provided evidence to the Committee which has been published as part of the report here.  Whilst welcoming the points and recommendations that were made, they also say It is...

read more

Colleagues, we have a problem

Harriet Harman KC's report is out. It brings with it a complicated mix of depression and optimism: depression (but not surprise) at how bad things are, and optimism because this report was commissioned by the Bar Council on our behalf and is now being embraced by it. They do so buoyed by a groundswell of support for action and change. We hope that other bodies who also are required to do their part will step up to the plate. The BSB for one - I haven't seen any immediate response from them (though their home page does link to a 'new' page on bullying and harassment. There was one section of the report which left me feeling more pessimistic than anticipated, and that was the section about the judges (Chapter 10). I didn't feel optimistic about that. Joshua Rozenberg has done a summary of the report here, so rather than repeat that I thought I'd focus on Chapter 10, which Joshua doesn't deal with in any detail. This is what Harriet Harman says about the judicial response: There is,...

read more

Staying Sane in Family Law

The lovely people at Bath Publishing* are running a series of workshops to launch a new book they are publishing by Anne Marie Carvalho. The book is called Staying Sane in Family Law – and the name Anne Marie Carvalho is one which often crops up in the context of wellbeing discussions. For a fee of £150 you get to attend one of the workshops and your own copy of the book. If I wasn't in court elsewhere on the day of the one local to me I would be going. For those interested details are here: https://bathpublishing.com/products/staying-sane-in-family-law-seminars * Declaration of interest. They are lovely because they publish my book Family Court Without a Lawyer, so obviously have very good taste in authors. I haven't read the book, but I do know that Anne Marie is highly respected in her field. And anything that can help us stay sane (or regain some sanity) in the crazy world of family law is A. Good. Thing.

read more

Court Service Cover Up?

NB I think this post was accidentally published yesterday in half finished form, something that has never happened before. It probably didn't make a lot of sense. However, this is now the tidied and completed version. The BBC Headline reads: Courts service 'covered up' IT bug that caused evidence to go missing The report claims that the upshot is that 'judges in civil, family and tribunal courts will have made rulings on cases when evidence was incomplete.' This news is pretty alarming, isn't it? But also somewhat impenetrable. What does it actually mean? What was missing? How often did it happen? How important was it and did judges know information was missing? Because all we have is a news report about a leaked internal report, the detail is pretty much absent. The report tells us that the software concerned is 'known variously as Judicial Case Manager, MyHMCTS or CCD - is used to manage evidence and track cases before the courts. It is used by judges, lawyers, case workers and...

read more

About this blog

“Pink Tape” isn’t just about family law. I post about topics that interest me, which mostly revolve around family law, but also include non-legal family-related topics as well as unrelated subjects. I hope this blog will convince at least one person that not all of us in the legal profession are money-hungry sharks. Some of us are actually quite nice. Additionally, I aim to provide useful information about family law for those working in the field without being too heavy or boring.

The primary goal of the blog is to improve the quality of public information and discussions about legal issues.

I understand that not everyone is a fan of “Pink Tape” or family lawyers in general.

latest

Blog Posts

A plea for some self restraint

I don't want to sound like your mother, but I can't help noticing that a surprising number of family lawyers have found the ColdPlay accidental affair reveal to be irresistible fodder for a spot of marketing. And as yet another post pops into my LinkedIn feed this...

Still here…

There hasn't been any Pink Tape email for a long time... It isn't entirely because I've not posted anything - I have, in fact, posted a few things....In June I posted four posts - averaging one a week is not quite the rate I was going in the heyday of Pink Tape, but...

The delicate politics of the automated reply

I've changed my out of office three times in the last couple of weeks. One change to say I was so busy that I might take some time to respond (this one offended someone who wasn't as busy and who presumably thought I was just being a show off and rubbing their nose in...

A confusing post-script

I came across an article in the Gazette this week with the headline: Judge issues pre-trial legal aid plea after mother left alone The article refers to this judgment of DJ Keating: London Borough of Sutton v A mother & Anor [2025] EWFC 147 (B) (bonus points to...

The small matter of fees

I know we're not supposed to mention fees. It's crass to talk about money - that's what clerks are for and all that. But now, it seems, we are expected to keep calm and carry on without any expectation of prompt payment of fees at all. An unspecified amount on an...

Remembering Mr Banks

I know some would say I have a tendency to overshare, but I'm afraid it's hardwired, so look away now if that sort of thing makes you feel uncomfortable. There are some things I haven't shared though. The last few years have been...complicated at home. You will have...

Mea Culpa – a rather belated clarification

Some past version of me wrote a blog post in 2019, which someone recently reminded me of. It said that the family court can't order seizure of a device. Oh, I said glibly, I must have written that before the creation of the family court in 2014, because that...

A learning experience

Two judgments have been circulating this week which reflect very badly on lawyers, or at any rate on two individual lawyers. I’ve been thinking a lot about them. They are uncomfortable reading for any lawyer and for any person who cares about justice. Because justice...

Rules of the blog

Anonymized or fictional

All the information on this blog is anonymized or fictional to avoid causing any trouble for anyone, including myself. I have modified details to prevent the identification of specific cases.

Comments

 I won’t approve comments that, in my judgment, breach privacy laws related to family matters. Unless individuals have been identified in a published judgment, I won’t disclose their involvement in any proceedings.

Nothing Defamatory

 I will not post anything that I believe could be considered defamatory. Due to time constraints, I can’t fact-check every statement in a comment. Therefore, I must be cautious to prevent potential legal issues or threatening letters. If you’re certain that a comment is not defamatory, you can publish it elsewhere at your own risk.

NOT Legal Advice

The content of this blog is not intended to constitute legal advice, so please don’t interpret it as such. It may seem relevant to your situation, but it likely isn’t. I cannot be held responsible for any reliance you place on its contents.

Accuracy

The information on the blog is as accurate and up to date as possible, considering my other commitments. Pink Tape is a hobby that I work on when time allows. Therefore, I can’t cover all legal changes or update information that becomes outdated.

External Links

I cannot be held responsible for the content of external sites linked from this blog, in terms of their accuracy or the opinions expressed on them

Moderation

I’ve implemented comment moderation on this blog to filter out comments that are repeatedly negative or offensive about lawyers. Rest assured, I won’t block sensible contributions, even if they disagree with me. I will strive to moderate promptly, but occasionally a comment may get lost in spam.

Right of Reply

If a post contains an inaccuracy about you and you’d like it corrected, feel free to comment for a right of reply. Please respect that the content on this blog is my intellectual property, and ask for permission before reposting. If you have any topics or blog post suggestions, feel free to email me at familoo@pinktape.co.uk.

Copyright

All material on this site is copyright of Lucy Reed. Please do not reproduce without permission.