...in which I ricochet from too serious to too flippant and where I may vent, rant or wax lyrical at my own whim, mostly about family law. Constructive co-ranting welcome. More...

Family Law Oscars

That’s me that is. In my very cheap dress. What was I thinking…



rants

Lawyer v AI [2025] PT (Fam) – Some thoughts for litigants in person on the risks of using AI in your Family Court case

17 Nov 2025

If I had a quid for every email that comes into my inbox about the use of AI in law, I’d be retiring. Horror stories...

What is the difference between a ‘QLR’ and a QLR?

10 Oct 2025

It's Friday. I've been staring at a screen all day and my eyes have gone funny from scrolling through spreadsheets. I...

Joining the dots…

18 Sep 2025

Last week the Public Accounts Committee published a damning report telling us that family justice was failing...

←Why didn't I think of that before? We'd like to apologise for the disruption to your service →

2 Comments

Bob on 4 November 2012 at 5:49 pm

Good for you. Well done. The dress is not important.
Reply
Andrew on 13 November 2012 at 3:22 pm

You look fab.
Reply

Pink Tape

A BLOG FROM THE FAMILY BAR

Archives

1 November 2012

Family Law Oscars

rants

Lawyer v AI [2025] PT (Fam) – Some thoughts for litigants in person on the risks of using AI in your Family Court case

What is the difference between a ‘QLR’ and a QLR?

Joining the dots…

2 Comments

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Archives

1 November 2012

Family Law Oscars

Share this:

rants

Lawyer v AI [2025] PT (Fam) – Some thoughts for litigants in person on the risks of using AI in your Family Court case

What is the difference between a ‘QLR’ and a QLR?

Joining the dots…

2 Comments

Submit a Comment Cancel reply